Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: We aren't notified of our own failure w/ NOTIFY_BAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Stephen Boyd (2020-04-23 19:38:24)
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-22 14:55:00)
> > When a PM Notifier returns NOTIFY_BAD it doesn't get called with
> > CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED.  It only get called for CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED if
> > someone else (further down the notifier chain) returns NOTIFY_BAD.
> > 
> > Handle this case by taking our CPU out of the list of ones that have
> > entered PM.  Without this it's possible we could detect that the last
> > CPU went down (and we would flush) even if some CPU was alive.  That's
> > not good since our flushing routines currently assume they're running
> > on the last CPU for mutual exclusion.
> > 
> > Fixes: 985427f997b6 ("soc: qcom: rpmh: Invoke rpmh_flush() for dirty caches")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Scratch that one! Copy/paste for the lose.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux