Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add hpd-gpios to the bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-15 08:48:40)
> Allow people to specify to use a GPIO for hot-plug-detect.  Add an
> example.
> 
> NOTE: The current patch adding support for hpd-gpios to the Linux
> driver for hpd-gpios only adds enough support to the driver so that
> the bridge can use one of its own GPIOs.  The bindings, however, are
> written generically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml          | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> index 8cacc6db33a9..554bfd003000 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ properties:
>      const: 1
>      description: See ../../pwm/pwm.yaml for description of the cell formats.
>  
> +  hpd-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: If present use the given GPIO for hot-plug-detect.

Shouldn't this go in the panel node? And the panel driver should get the
gpio and poll it after powering up the panel? Presumably that's why we
have the no-hpd property in the simple panel binding vs. putting it here
in the bridge.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux