Re: [PATCH 1/3] bus: mhi: core: Handle syserr during power_up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/7/2020 12:26 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:04:35PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
The MHI device may be in the syserr state when we attempt to init it in
power_up().  Since we have no local state, the handling is simple -
reset the device and wait for it to transition out of the reset state.

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
index 52690cb..cd6ba23 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  #include <linux/dma-direction.h>
  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
  #include <linux/list.h>
  #include <linux/mhi.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ static void mhi_deassert_dev_wake(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
int mhi_async_power_up(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
  {
+	enum mhi_state state;
  	enum mhi_ee_type current_ee;
  	enum dev_st_transition next_state;
  	struct device *dev = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev;
@@ -829,6 +831,24 @@ int mhi_async_power_up(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
  		goto error_bhi_offset;
  	}
+ state = mhi_get_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl);
+	if (state == MHI_STATE_SYS_ERR) {
+		mhi_set_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl, MHI_STATE_RESET);
+		ret = readl_poll_timeout(mhi_cntrl->regs + MHICTRL, val,
+					 !(val & MHICTRL_RESET_MASK), 1000,

Hmm. Do we really need a max 1ms delay between each read? I'd prefer to have
100ns to reduce the wait time.


I assume you mean 100us since that's the units of the parameter, and usleep_range is the actual delay mechanism. Please correct me if that is a bad assumption.

I chose 1ms to try to avoid flooding the bus, since on one system we care about, the round trip time was observed to be ~1ms. However, that is fairly arbitrary, so a factor of 10 reduction don't seem like a significant issue.


+					 mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms * 1000);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_info(dev, "Failed to reset syserr\n");

dev_info(dev, "Failed to reset MHI due to syserr state\n"); ?


Ah yes, that is clearer.  Thanks

--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux