Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] PM / EM: add devices to Energy Model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,

Thank you for the review.

On 4/3/20 5:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

Hi Lukasz,


On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
Add support of other devices into the Energy Model framework not only the
CPUs. Change the interface to be more unified which can handle other
devices as well.

thanks for taking care of that. Overall I like the changes in this patch
but it hard to review in details because the patch is too big :/

Could you split this patch into smaller ones?

eg. (at your convenience)

  - One patch renaming s/cap/perf/

  - One patch adding a new function:

     em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev,
				unsigned int nr_states,
				struct em_data_callback *cb);

    (+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL)

     And em_register_perf_domain() using it.

  - One converting the em_register_perf_domain() user to
	em_dev_register_perf_domain

  - One adding the different new 'em' functions

  - And finally one removing em_register_perf_domain().

I agree and will do the split. I could also break the dependencies
for future easier merge.



Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
---

[ ... ]

  2. Core APIs
@@ -70,14 +72,16 @@ CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL must be enabled to use the EM framework.
  Drivers are expected to register performance domains into the EM framework by
  calling the following API::
- int em_register_perf_domain(cpumask_t *span, unsigned int nr_states,
-			      struct em_data_callback *cb);
+  int em_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
+		struct em_data_callback *cb, cpumask_t *cpus);

Isn't possible to get rid of this cpumask by using
cpufreq_cpu_get() which returns the cpufreq's policy and from their get
the related cpus ?

We had similar thoughts with Quentin and I've checked this.
Unfortunately, if the policy is a 'new policy' [1] it gets
allocated and passed into cpufreq driver ->init(policy) [2].
Then that policy is set into per_cpu pointer for each related_cpu [3]:

for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
	per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = policy;


Thus, any calls of functions (i.e. cpufreq_cpu_get()) which try to
take this ptr before [3] won't work.

We are trying to register EM from cpufreq_driver->init(policy) and the
per_cpu policy is likely to be not populated at that phase.

Regards,
Lukasz

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c#L1328 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c#L1350 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c#L1374





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux