Re: [RFT PATCH v2 05/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: A lot of comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 3/12/2020 4:43 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
I've been pouring through the rpmh-rsc code and trying to understand
it.  Document everything to the best of my ability.  All documentation
here is strictly from code analysis--no actual knowledge of the
hardware was used.  If something is wrong in here I either
misunderstood the code, had a typo, or the code has a bug in it
leading to my incorrect understanding.

In a few places here I have documented things that don't make tons of
sense.  A future patch will try to address this.  While this means I'm
adding comments / todos and then later fixing them in the series, it
seemed more urgent to get things documented first so that people could
understand the later patches.

This should be a no-op.  It's just comment changes.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v2:
- More clear that active-only xfers can happen on wake TCS sometimes.
- Document locks for updating "tcs_in_use" more.
- Document tcs_is_free() without drv->lock OK for tcs_invalidate().
- Document bug of tcs_write() not handling -EAGAIN.
- Document get_tcs_for_msg() => -EAGAIN only for ACTIVE_ONLY.
- Reword tcs_write() doc a bit.
- Document two get_tcs_for_msg() issues if zero-active TCS.
- Document that rpmh_rsc_send_data() can be an implicit invalidate.
- Fixed documentation of "tcs" param in find_slots().

  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h |  52 +++---
  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c      | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  2 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
index 6eec32b97f83..b756d3036e96 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
@@ -22,16 +22,25 @@ struct rsc_drv;
   * struct tcs_group: group of Trigger Command Sets (TCS) to send state requests
   * to the controller
   *
- * @drv:       the controller
- * @type:      type of the TCS in this group - active, sleep, wake
- * @mask:      mask of the TCSes relative to all the TCSes in the RSC
- * @offset:    start of the TCS group relative to the TCSes in the RSC
- * @num_tcs:   number of TCSes in this type
- * @ncpt:      number of commands in each TCS
- * @lock:      lock for synchronizing this TCS writes
- * @req:       requests that are sent from the TCS
- * @cmd_cache: flattened cache of cmds in sleep/wake TCS
- * @slots:     indicates which of @cmd_addr are occupied
+ * @drv:       The controller.
+ * @type:      Type of the TCS in this group - active, sleep, wake.
+ * @mask:      Mask of the TCSes relative to all the TCSes in the RSC.
+ * @offset:    Start of the TCS group relative to the TCSes in the RSC.
+ * @num_tcs:   Number of TCSes in this type.
+ * @ncpt:      Number of commands in each TCS.
+ * @lock:      Lock for synchronizing this TCS writes.
+ * @req:       Requests that are sent from the TCS; only used for ACTIVE_ONLY
+ *             transfers (could be on a wake/sleep TCS if we are borrowing for
+ *             an ACTIVE_ONLY transfer).
+ *             Start: grab drv->lock, set req, set tcs_in_use, drop drv->lock,
+ *                    trigger
+ *             End: get irq, access req,
+ *                  grab drv->lock, clear tcs_in_use, drop drv->lock
+ * @cmd_cache: Flattened cache of cmds in sleep/wake TCS; num_tcs * ncpt big.
+ * @slots:     Indicates which of @cmd_addr are occupied; only used for
+ *             SLEEP / WAKE TCSs.  Things are tightly packed in the
+ *             case that (ncpt < MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS).  That is if ncpt = 2 and
+ *             MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS = 16 then bit[2] = the first bit in 2nd TCS.
   */
  struct tcs_group {
  	struct rsc_drv *drv;
@@ -84,14 +93,21 @@ struct rpmh_ctrlr {
   * struct rsc_drv: the Direct Resource Voter (DRV) of the
   * Resource State Coordinator controller (RSC)
   *
- * @name:       controller identifier
- * @tcs_base:   start address of the TCS registers in this controller
- * @id:         instance id in the controller (Direct Resource Voter)
- * @num_tcs:    number of TCSes in this DRV
- * @tcs:        TCS groups
- * @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS
- * @lock:       synchronize state of the controller
- * @client:     handle to the DRV's client.
+ * @name:       Controller identifier.
+ * @tcs_base:   Start address of the TCS registers in this controller.
+ * @id:         Instance id in the controller (Direct Resource Voter).
+ * @num_tcs:    Number of TCSes in this DRV.
+ * @tcs:        TCS groups.
+ * @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS; only set for ACTIVE_ONLY transfers, but
+ *              might show a sleep/wake TCS in use if it was borrowed for an
+ *              active_only transfer.  You must hold both the lock in this
+ *              struct and the tcs_lock for the TCS in order to mark a TCS as
+ *              in-use, but you only need the lock in this structure to mark
+ *              one freed.
+ * @lock:       Synchronize state of the controller.  If you will be grabbing
+ *              this lock and a tcs_lock at the same time, grab the tcs_lock
+ *              first so we always have a consistent lock ordering.
+ * @client:     Handle to the DRV's client.
   */
  struct rsc_drv {
  	const char *name;
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index c9f29cbd5ee5..9d2669cbd994 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -164,12 +164,38 @@ static void write_tcs_reg_sync(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id,
  	}
  }
+/**
+ * tcs_is_free() - Return if a TCS is totally free.
+ * @drv:    The RSC controller.
+ * @tcs_id: The global ID of this TCS.
+ *
+ * Returns true if nobody has claimed this TCS (by setting tcs_in_use).
+ * If the TCS looks free, checks that the hardware agrees.
+ *
+ * Must be called with the drv->lock held or the tcs_lock for the TCS being
+ * tested.  If only the tcs_lock is held then it is possible that this
+ * function will return that a tcs is still busy when it has been recently
+ * been freed but it will never return free when a TCS is actually in use.
+ *
+ * Return: true if the given TCS is free.
+ */
  static bool tcs_is_free(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
  {
  	return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use) &&
  	       read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id);
  }
+/**
+ * tcs_invalidate() - Invalidate all TCSs of the given type (sleep or wake).
+ * @drv:  The RSC controller.
+ * @type: SLEEP_TCS or WAKE_TCS
+ *
+ * This will clear the "slots" variable of the given tcs_group and also
+ * tell the hardware to forget about all entries.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if no problem, or -EAGAIN if the caller should try again in a
+ *         bit.  Caller should make sure to enable interrupts between tries.
+ */
  static int tcs_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
  {
  	int m;
@@ -196,9 +222,11 @@ static int tcs_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
  }
/**
- * rpmh_rsc_invalidate - Invalidate sleep and wake TCSes
+ * rpmh_rsc_invalidate() - Invalidate sleep and wake TCSes.
+ * @drv: The RSC controller.
   *
- * @drv: the RSC controller
+ * Return: 0 if no problem, or -EAGAIN if the caller should try again in a
+ *         bit.  Caller should make sure to enable interrupts between tries.
   */
  int rpmh_rsc_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv)
  {
@@ -211,6 +239,20 @@ int rpmh_rsc_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv)
  	return ret;
  }
+/**
+ * get_tcs_for_msg() - Get the tcs_group used to send the given message.
+ * @drv: The RSC controller.
+ * @msg: The message we want to send.
+ *
+ * This is normally pretty straightforward except if we are trying to send
+ * an ACTIVE_ONLY message but don't have any active_only TCSs.
+ *
+ * Called without drv->lock held and with no tcs_lock locks held.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if no problem, or -EAGAIN if the caller should try again in a bit.
+ *         Caller should make sure to enable interrupts between tries.
+ *         Only ever returns -EAGAIN for ACTIVE_ONLY transfers.
with [2] it will not return -EAGAIN, can you please remove this part.
+ */
  static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_for_msg(struct rsc_drv *drv,
  					 const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {
@@ -246,12 +288,35 @@ static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_for_msg(struct rsc_drv *drv,
  			ret = rpmh_rsc_invalidate(drv);
  			if (ret)
  				return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+			/*
+			 * TODO:
+			 * - Temporarily enable IRQs on the wake tcs.
+			 * - Make sure nobody else race with us and re-write
+			 *   to this TCS; document how this works.
You can remove above comment, i already included change to enable IRQs on wake TCS in my series.
+			 */
  		}
  	}
return tcs;
  }
+/**
+ * get_req_from_tcs() - Get a stashed request that was xfering on the given tcs.
+ * @drv:    The RSC controller.
+ * @tcs_id: The global ID of this TCS.
+ *
+ * For ACTIVE_ONLY transfers we want to call back into the client when the
+ * transfer finishes.  To do this we need the "request" that the client
+ * originally provided us.  This function grabs the request that we stashed
+ * when we started the transfer.
+ *
+ * This only makes sense for ACTIVE_ONLY transfers since those are the only
+ * ones we track sending (the only ones we enable interrupts for and the only
+ * ones we call back to the client for).
+ *
+ * Return: The stashed request.
+ */
  static const struct tcs_request *get_req_from_tcs(struct rsc_drv *drv,
  						  int tcs_id)
  {
@@ -268,7 +333,14 @@ static const struct tcs_request *get_req_from_tcs(struct rsc_drv *drv,
  }
/**
- * tcs_tx_done: TX Done interrupt handler
+ * tcs_tx_done() - TX Done interrupt handler.
+ * @irq: The IRQ number (ignored).
+ * @p:   Pointer to "struct rsc_drv".
+ *
+ * Called for ACTIVE_ONLY TCSs (those are the only ones we enable the IRQ for)
+ * when a transfer is done.
+ *
+ * Return: IRQ_HANDLED
   */
  static irqreturn_t tcs_tx_done(int irq, void *p)
  {
@@ -278,6 +350,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tcs_tx_done(int irq, void *p)
  	const struct tcs_request *req;
  	struct tcs_cmd *cmd;
+ /* NOTE: interrupt status for all TCSs are found in TCS 0 */
  	irq_status = read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_IRQ_STATUS, 0);
for_each_set_bit(i, &irq_status, BITS_PER_LONG) {
@@ -318,6 +391,16 @@ static irqreturn_t tcs_tx_done(int irq, void *p)
  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
  }
+/**
+ * __tcs_buffer_write() - Write to TCS hardware from a request; don't trigger.
+ * @drv:    The controller.
+ * @tcs_id: The global ID of this TCS.
+ * @cmd_id: The index within the TCS to start writing.
+ * @msg:    The message we want to send, which will contain several addr/data
+ *          pairs to program (but few enough that they all fit in one TCS).
+ *
+ * This is used for all types of TCSs (active, sleep, and wake).
+ */
  static void __tcs_buffer_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
  			       const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {
@@ -351,6 +434,15 @@ static void __tcs_buffer_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
  	write_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, tcs_id, cmd_enable);
  }
+/**
+ * __tcs_trigger() - Start transferring on the given TCS.
+ *
+ * The TCS given is probably the active-only one, but could be a wake one
+ * that we borrowed if there are zero active-only TCSs.
+ *
+ * @drv:    The controller.
+ * @tcs_id: The global ID of this TCS.
+ */
  static void __tcs_trigger(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
  {
  	u32 enable;
@@ -373,6 +465,27 @@ static void __tcs_trigger(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
  	write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, RSC_DRV_CONTROL, tcs_id, enable);
  }
+/**
+ * check_for_req_inflight() - Look to see if conflicting cmds are in flight.
+ * @drv: The controller.
+ * @tcs: A pointer to the tcs_group used for ACTIVE_ONLY transfers.
+ * @msg: The message we want to send, which will contain several addr/data
+ *       pairs to program (but few enough that they all fit in one TCS).
+ *
+ * Only for use for ACTIVE_ONLY tcs_group, since those are the only ones
+ * that might be actively sending.

This comment will need to modify/removed after we use this in place of find_match().

see below for more details.

+ *
+ * This will walk through the TCSs in the group and check if any of them
+ * appear to be sending to addresses referenced in the message.  If it finds
+ * one it'll return -EBUSY.
+ *
+ * Must be called with the drv->lock held since that protects tcs_in_use.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if nothing in flight or -EBUSY if we should try again later.
+ *         The caller must re-enable interrupts between tries since that's
+ *         the only way tcs_is_free() will ever return true and the only way
+ *         RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE will ever be cleared.
+ */
  static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
  				  const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {
@@ -399,6 +512,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
  	return 0;
  }
+/**
+ * find_free_tcs() - Find free tcs in the given tcs_group; only for ACTIVE_ONLY.
+ * @tcs: A pointer to the ACTIVE_ONLY tcs_group (or the wake tcs_group if
+ *       we borrowed it because there are zero active-only ones).
+ *
+ * Must be called with the drv->lock held since that protects tcs_in_use.
+ *
+ * Return: The first tcs that's free.
+ */
  static int find_free_tcs(struct tcs_group *tcs)
  {
  	int i;
@@ -411,6 +533,20 @@ static int find_free_tcs(struct tcs_group *tcs)
  	return -EBUSY;
  }
+/**
+ * tcs_write() - Store messages into a TCS right now, or return -EBUSY.
+ * @drv: The controller.
+ * @msg: The data to be sent.
+ *
+ * Grabs a TCS for ACTIVE_ONLY transfers and writes the messages to it.
+ *
+ * If there are no free ACTIVE_ONLY TCSs or if a command for the same address
+ * is already transferring returns -EBUSY which means the client should retry
+ * shortly.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -EBUSY if client should retry, or an error.
+ *         Client should have interrupts enabled for a bit before retrying.
+ */
  static int tcs_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {
  	struct tcs_group *tcs;
@@ -418,16 +554,14 @@ static int tcs_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  	unsigned long flags;
  	int ret;
+ /* TODO: get_tcs_for_msg() can return -EAGAIN and nobody handles */
with [2] it will not return -EAGAIN, can you please remove this comment.
  	tcs = get_tcs_for_msg(drv, msg);
  	if (IS_ERR(tcs))
  		return PTR_ERR(tcs);
spin_lock_irqsave(&tcs->lock, flags);
+
  	spin_lock(&drv->lock);
-	/*
-	 * The h/w does not like if we send a request to the same address,
-	 * when one is already in-flight or being processed.
-	 */
please keep above comment as it is.
  	ret = check_for_req_inflight(drv, tcs, msg);
  	if (ret) {
  		spin_unlock(&drv->lock);
@@ -454,14 +588,30 @@ static int tcs_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  }
/**
- * rpmh_rsc_send_data: Validate the incoming message and write to the
- * appropriate TCS block.
+ * rpmh_rsc_send_data() - Validate the incoming message + write to TCS block.
+ * @drv: The controller.
+ * @msg: The data to be sent.
   *
- * @drv: the controller
- * @msg: the data to be sent
+ * NOTES:
+ * - This is only used for "ACTIVE_ONLY" since the limitations of this
+ *   function don't make sense for sleep/wake cases.
+ * - To do the transfer, we will grab a whole TCS for ourselves--we don't
+ *   try to share.  If there are none available we'll wait indefinitely
+ *   for a free one.
+ * - This function will not wait for the commands to be finished, only for
+ *   data to be programmed into the RPMh.  See rpmh_tx_done() which will
+ *   be called when the transfer is fully complete.
+ * - This function must be called with interrupts enabled.  If the hardware
+ *   is busy doing someone else's transfer we need that transfer to fully
+ *   finish so that we can have the hardware, and to fully finish it needs
+ *   the interrupt handler to run.  If the interrupts is set to run on the
+ *   active CPU this can never happen if interrupts are disabled.
+ * - If there are no active TCS calling this function can cause an implicit
+ *   call to rpmh_rsc_invalidate().  Unless you know for sure that you have
+ *   an active TCS you should assume that you need to re-write sleep/wake
+ *   values after calling this function.
   *
   * Return: 0 on success, -EINVAL on error.
- * Note: This call blocks until a valid data is written to the TCS.
   */
  int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {
@@ -485,6 +635,63 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  	return ret;
  }
+/**
+ * find_match() - Find if the cmd sequence is in the tcs_group
+ * @tcs: The tcs_group to search.  Either sleep or wake.
+ * @cmd: The command sequence to search for; only addr is looked at.
+ * @len: The number of commands in the sequence.
+ *
+ * Searches through the given tcs_group to see if a given command sequence
+ * is in there.
+ *
+ * Two sequences are matches if they modify the same set of addresses in
+ * the same order.  The value of the data is not considered when deciding if
+ * two things are matches.
+ *
+ * How this function works is best understood by example.  For our example,
+ * we'll imagine our tcs group contains these (cmd, data) tuples:
+ *   [(a, A), (b, B), (c, C), (d, D), (e, E), (f, F), (g, G), (h, H)]
+ * ...in other words it has an element where (addr=a, data=A), etc.
+ * ...we'll assume that there is one TCS in the group that can store 8 commands.
+ *
+ * - find_match([(a, X)]) => 0
+ * - find_match([(c, X), (d, X)]) => 2
+ * - find_match([(c, X), (d, X), (e, X)]) => 2
+ * - find_match([(z, X)]) => -ENODATA
+ * - find_match([(a, X), (y, X)]) => -EINVAL (and warning printed)
+ * - find_match([(g, X), (h, X), (i, X)]) => -EINVAL (and warning printed)
+ * - find_match([(y, X), (a, X)]) => -ENODATA
+ *
+ * NOTE: This function overall seems like it has questionable value.
+ * - It can be used to update a message in the TCS with new data, but I
+ *   don't believe we actually do that--we always fully invalidate and
+ *   re-write everything.
we are doing this from [1] onwards.
Specifically it would be too limiting to force
+ *   someone not to change the set of addresses written to each time.
+ * - This function could be attempting to avoid writing different data to
+ *   the same address twice in a tcs_group.  If that's the goal, it doesn't
+ *   do a great job since find_match([(y, X), (a, X)]) return -ENODATA in my
+ *   above example.
+ * - If you originally wrote [(a, A), (b, B), (c, C)] and later tried to
+ *   write [(a, A), (b, B)] it'd look like a match and we wouldn't consider
+ *   it an error that the size got shorter.
+ * - If two clients wrote sequences that happened to be placed in slots next
+ *   to each other then a later check could match a sequence that was the
+ *   size of both together.
+ *
+ * TODO: in light of the above, prehaps we can just remove this function?

We still need to check there is no duplicate request in a TCS for SLEEP and WAKE as well.

find_match() checks if the request already exist for a resource then update with new value, in a way preventing new request to go in

when one already exists. I am ok to remove this function since after [1] we always fully invalidate and then re-write and little point in

finding a match now. However we need to use check_for_req_inflight() from tcs_ctrl_write() with little modification to ignore tcs_is_free()

check if is called from tcs_ctrlr_write().

After this change on 9th change in your series,  please move it before current patch in series.

please also keep dependency on [1] for 9th change.

+ * If we later come up with fancy algorithms for updating everything without
+ * full invalidations we can come up with something then.
+ *
+ * Only for use on sleep/wake TCSs since those are the only ones we maintain
+ * tcs->slots and tcs->cmd_cache for.
+ *
+ * Must be called with the tcs_lock for the group held.
+ *
+ * Return: If the given command sequence wasn't in the tcs_group: -ENODATA.
+ *         If the given command sequence was in the tcs_group: the index of
+ *         the slot in the tcs_group where the first command is.
+ *         In some error cases (see above), -EINVAL.
+ */
  static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd *cmd,
  		      int len)
  {
@@ -497,6 +704,11 @@ static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd *cmd,
  		if (i + len >= tcs->num_tcs * tcs->ncpt)
  			goto seq_err;
  		for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
+			/*
+			 * TODO: it's actually not valid to look at
+			 * "cmd_cache[x]" if "slots[x]" doesn't have a bit
+			 * set.  Should add a check.
+			 */
  			if (tcs->cmd_cache[i + j] != cmd[j].addr)
  				goto seq_err;
  		}
@@ -510,6 +722,23 @@ static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_cmd *cmd,
  	return -EINVAL;
  }
+/**
+ * find_slots() - Find a place to write the given message.
+ * @tcs:    The tcs group to search.
+ * @msg:    The message we want to find room for.
+ * @tcs_id: If we return 0 from the function, we return the global ID of the
+ *          TCS to write to here.
+ * @cmd_id: If we return 0 from the function, we return the index of
+ *          the command array of the returned TCS where the client should
+ *          start writing the message.
+ *
+ * Only for use on sleep/wake TCSs since those are the only ones we maintain
+ * tcs->slots and tcs->cmd_cache for.
+ *
+ * Must be called with the tcs_lock for the group held.
+ *
+ * Return: -ENOMEM if there was no room, else 0.
+ */
  static int find_slots(struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_request *msg,
  		      int *tcs_id, int *cmd_id)
  {
@@ -521,7 +750,7 @@ static int find_slots(struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_request *msg,
  	if (slot >= 0)
  		goto copy_data;
- /* Do over, until we can fit the full payload in a TCS */
+	/* Do over, until we can fit the full payload in a single TCS */
  	do {
  		slot = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(tcs->slots, MAX_TCS_SLOTS,
  						  i, msg->num_cmds, 0);
@@ -544,12 +773,13 @@ static int find_slots(struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_request *msg,
  }
/**
- * rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data: Write request to the controller
- *
- * @drv: the controller
- * @msg: the data to be written to the controller
+ * rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data() - Write request to controller but don't trigger.
+ * @drv: The controller.
+ * @msg: The data to be written to the controller.
   *
   * There is no response returned for writing the request to the controller.

you can remove above line since responce is returned from this function.

+ *
+ * Return: 0 if no error; else -error.
   */
  int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
  {

Thanks,
Maulik

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11467811/

[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11467821/

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux