On 3/10/2020 12:31 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2020-03-09 11:51:20) >> On Mon 09 Mar 11:23 PDT 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >>> Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-03-09 04:14:14) >>>> From: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Add device binding documentation for Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI) >>>> SoC sleep stats driver. The driver is used for displaying SoC sleep >>>> statistic maintained by Always On Processor or Resource Power Manager. >>>> >>>> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../bindings/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 00000000..7c29c61 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >>>> +%YAML 1.2 >>>> +--- >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/soc-sleep-stats.yaml# >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>>> + >>>> +title: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI) SoC sleep stats bindings >>>> + >>>> +maintainers: >>>> + - Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> + - Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> + >>>> +description: >>>> + Always On Processor/Resource Power Manager maintains statistics of the SoC >>>> + sleep modes involving powering down of the rails and oscillator clock. >>>> + >>>> + Statistics includes SoC sleep mode type, number of times low power mode were >>>> + entered, time of last entry, time of last exit and accumulated sleep duration. >>>> + >>>> +properties: >>>> + compatible: >>>> + enum: >>>> + - qcom,rpmh-sleep-stats >>>> + - qcom,rpm-sleep-stats >>>> + >>>> + reg: >>>> + maxItems: 1 >>>> + >>>> +required: >>>> + - compatible >>>> + - reg >>>> + >>>> +examples: >>>> + # Example of rpmh sleep stats >>>> + - | >>>> + rpmh_sleep_stats@c3f0000 { >>>> + compatible = "qcom,rpmh-sleep-stats"; >>>> + reg = <0 0xc3f0000 0 0x400>; >>>> + }; >>>> + # Example of rpm sleep stats >>>> + - | >>>> + rpm_sleep_stats@4690000 { >>> Node names don't have underscores. It really feels like we should be able >>> to get away with not having this device node at all. Why can't we have >>> the rpm message ram be a node that covers the entire range and then have >>> that either create a platform device for debugfs stats or just have it >>> register the stat information from whatever driver attaches to that >>> node? >>> >>> Carving this up into multiple nodes and making compatible strings >>> doesn't seem very useful here because we're essentially making device >>> nodes in DT for logical software components that exist in the rpm >>> message ram. >> It's been a while since I discussed this with Lina, but iirc I opted for >> the model you suggest and we concluded that it wouldn't fit with the RPM >> case. >> >> And given that, for reasons unknown to me, msgram isn't a single region, >> but a set of adjacent memory regions, this does seem to represent >> hardware better. >> > I guess there's message ram and code ram or something like that? Maybe > that's the problem? Either way it sounds like the node name needs to be > fixed to have dashes and then this is fine to keep. Describing memory > like this in DT just makes me sad. Hi, I will spin v5 with fixing node name. Thanks, Maulik -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation