On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:13:08PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > > +static ssize_t test_dev_config_show_size_t(char *buf, int cfg)
> > > > +{
> > > > + size_t val;
> > > > +
> > > > + mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > > + val = cfg;
> > > > + mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex);
> > > Both val and cfg are stack variables so there is no need for locking.
> > > Probably you meant to pass a pointer to cfg?
> I am following the existing code as was done for
> test_dev_config_show_bool(),
> test_dev_config_show_int(),
> test_dev_config_show_u8()
>
> Mutex probably not needed but I don't think I need to deviate from the rest
> of the test code.
>
> Luis, could you please explain what the rest of your code is doing?
The lock is indeed not needed in the functions you mentioned, so you can
also remove the other locks as a precursor patch. It would be a seperate
patch.
Luis
