On 05-02-20, 11:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > + CPU7: cpu@700 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x700>;
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + next-level-cache = <&L2_700>;
> > + L2_700: l2-cache {
> > + compatible = "cache";
> > + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + firmware: firmware {
>
> Does this need a label?
Nope, removed
> > + soc: soc@0 {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges = <0 0 0 0 0x10 0>;
> > + dma-ranges = <0 0 0 0 0x10 0>;
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > +
> > + gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,gcc-sm8250";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x00100000 0x0 0x1f0000>;
> > + #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + #reset-cells = <1>;
> > + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > + clock-names = "bi_tcxo",
> > + "sleep_clk";
>
> Weird tabbign here.
Fixed this and rest of them
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > +
> > + spmi_bus: qcom,spmi@c440000 {
>
> Node name should be 'spmi'.
Yup, changed
> > +
> > + rpmhcc: clock-controller {
> > + compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk";
> > + #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + clock-names = "xo";
> > + clocks = <&xo_board>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + tcsr_mutex_regs: syscon@1f40000 {
> > + compatible = "syscon";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x01f40000 0x0 0x40000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + timer@17c20000 {
>
> Doug fixed these in another thread to use offset. Run dt_bindings_check
> and see how it fails.
will do
>
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
> > + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer-mem";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x17c20000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>
> Remove this. Firmware should set it up properly.
Sure
--
~Vinod
