On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:14 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2/5/2020 6:05 AM, Evan Green wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:14 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Currently rpmh ctrlr dirty flag is set for all cases regardless > >> of data is really changed or not. > >> > >> Add changes to update it when data is updated to new values. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > >> index 035091f..c3d6f00 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > >> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c > >> @@ -139,20 +139,27 @@ static struct cache_req *cache_rpm_request(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, > >> existing: > >> switch (state) { > >> case RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE: > >> - if (req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX) > >> + if (req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX) { > >> req->wake_val = cmd->data; > >> + ctrlr->dirty = true; > >> + } > > Don't you need to set dirty = true for ACTIVE_ONLY state always? The > > conditional is just saying "if nobody set a sleep vote, then maintain > > this vote when we wake back up". > > The ACTIVE_ONLY vote is cached as wake_val to be apply when wakeup happens. > > In case value didn't change,wake_val is still same as older value and > there is no need to mark the entire cache as dirty. > Ah, I see it now. We don't actually cache active_only votes anywhere, since they're one time requests. The sleep/wake votes seem to be the only thing that gets cached. I was thinking it might be safer to also set dirty = true just after list_add_tail, since in the non-existing case this is a new batch that RPMh has never seen before and should always be written. But I suppose your checks here should cover that case, since sleep_val and wake_val are initialized to UINT_MAX. If you think the code might evolve, it might still be nice to add it. While I'm looking at that, why do we have this needless INIT_LIST_HEAD? INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list); list_add_tail(&req->list, &ctrlr->cache); -Evan > -- > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation