On Wed 22 Jan 22:46 PST 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-16 15:39:49)
> > @@ -490,6 +512,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845},
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7180},
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250},
>
> We should sort this on compatible.
>
Yes we should, in case this was a request I sent out a patch for this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200124175934.3937473-1-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
Regards,
Bjorn
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
