Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: Add documentation for MHI bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:10 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 01:58:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:18 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I don't see any callers of mhi_register_controller(). Did I just miss it or did
> > you not post one? I'm particularly interested in where the configuration comes
> > from, is this hardcoded in the driver, or parsed from firmware or from registers
> > in the hardware itself?
> >
>
> I have not included the controller driver in this patchset. But you can take a
> look at the ath11k controller driver here:
> https://git.linaro.org/people/manivannan.sadhasivam/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c?h=ath11k-qca6390-mhi#n13
>
> So the configuration comes from the static structures defined in the controller
> driver. Earlier revision derived the configuration from devicetree but there are
> many cases where this MHI bus is being used in non DT environments like x86.
> So inorder to be platform agnostic, we chose static declaration method.
>
> In future we can add DT/ACPI support for the applicable parameters.

What determines the configuration? Is this always something that is fixed
in hardware, or can some of the properties be changed based on what
firmware runs the device?

If this is determined by the firmware, maybe the configuration would also
need to be loaded from the file that contains the firmware, which in turn
could be a blob in DT.

     Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux