I see the following lockdep splat in the qcom pinctrl driver when
attempting to suspend the device.
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.4.2 #2 Tainted: G S
--------------------------------------------
cat/6536 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff814787ccc0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff81436740c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by cat/6536:
#0: ffffff8140e0c420 (sb_writers#7){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0xc8/0x19c
#1: ffffff8121eec480 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x1f4
#2: ffffff8147cad668 (kn->count#263){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x130/0x1f4
#3: ffffffd011446000 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}, at: pm_suspend+0x108/0x354
#4: ffffff814302b970 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_suspend+0x16c/0x420
#5: ffffff81436740c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
#6: ffffff81479b8c10 (&pctrl->lock){....}, at: msm_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x48/0x7c
stack backtrace:
CPU: 4 PID: 6536 Comm: cat Tainted: G S 5.4.2 #2
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x174
show_stack+0x20/0x2c
dump_stack+0xdc/0x144
__lock_acquire+0x52c/0x2268
lock_acquire+0x1dc/0x220
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x64/0x80
__irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
irq_set_irq_wake+0x40/0x144
msm_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x5c/0x7c
set_irq_wake_real+0x40/0x5c
irq_set_irq_wake+0x70/0x144
cros_ec_rtc_suspend+0x38/0x4c
platform_pm_suspend+0x34/0x60
dpm_run_callback+0x64/0xcc
__device_suspend+0x314/0x420
dpm_suspend+0xf8/0x298
dpm_suspend_start+0x84/0xb4
suspend_devices_and_enter+0xbc/0x628
pm_suspend+0x214/0x354
state_store+0xb0/0x108
kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24
sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x64
kernfs_fop_write+0x158/0x1f4
__vfs_write+0x54/0x18c
vfs_write+0xdc/0x19c
ksys_write+0x7c/0xe4
__arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x2c
el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x160
el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x38
el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10
This is because the msm_gpio_irq_set_wake() function calls
irq_set_irq_wake() as a backup in case the irq comes in during the path
to idle. Given that we're calling irqchip functions from within an
irqchip we need to set the lockdep class to be different for this child
controller vs. the default one that the parent irqchip gets.
This used to be done before this driver was converted to hierarchical
irq domains in commit e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in
hierarchy") via the gpiochip_irq_map() function. With hierarchical irq
domains this function has been replaced by
gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc(). Therefore, set the lockdep class
like was done previously in the irq domain path so we can avoid this
lockdep warning.
Fixes: fdd61a013a24 ("gpio: Add support for hierarchical IRQ domains")
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 967371377a9d..dcdbdddb3396 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2040,6 +2040,7 @@ static int gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *d,
parent_type);
chip_info(gc, "alloc_irqs_parent for %d parent hwirq %d\n",
irq, parent_hwirq);
+ irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, gc->irq.lock_key, gc->irq.request_key);
ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(d, irq, 1, &parent_fwspec);
if (ret)
chip_err(gc,
--
Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet
