Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] soc: qcom: apr: Add avs/audio tracking functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-01-03 02:27, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Sun 29 Dec 21:00 PST 2019, Sibi Sankar wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c
[..]
-static void of_register_apr_devices(struct device *dev)
+static void of_apr_add_pd_lookups(struct device *dev)
 {
+	const char *service_name, *service_path;
 	struct apr *apr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct device_node *node;
+	int ret;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
+		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "qcom,protection-domain",
+						    0, &service_name);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			continue;

While this implies that the qcom,protection-domain property is
missing...

+
+		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "qcom,protection-domain",
+						    1, &service_path);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			continue;

...this would imply that it's there but the format is wrong. I think you
should log this and propagate the error.

+
+		ret = pdr_add_lookup(&apr->pdr, service_name, service_path);
+		if (ret && ret != -EALREADY)
+			dev_err(dev, "pdr add lookup failed: %d\n", ret);

So we have a DT that denotes that PDR is required, but we failed to
register a lookup (for some reason). That would imply that apr is not
going to work. I think you should propagate this and make apr_probe()
fail to make this obvious.

this was predominantly done to deal
with a mix of apr devices where some
of them are independent of PDs so
making apr_probe fail is detrimental
here. Also apr devices having improper
format will not be registered or removed.


+	}
+}
+
+static void of_register_apr_devices(struct device *dev, const char *svc_path)
+{
+	struct apr *apr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct device_node *node;
+	const char *service_path;
+	int ret;

 	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
 		struct apr_device_id id = { {0} };

I think you should add a comment here describing what's actually going
on. Something along the lines of:

/*
 * This function is called with svc_path NULL during apr_probe(), in
 * which case we register any apr devices without a
 * qcom,protection-domain specified.
 *
* Then as the protection domains becomes available (if applicable) this
 * function is again called, but with svc_path representing the service
 * becoming available. In this case we register any apr devices with a
 * matching qcom,protection-domain.
 */

Thanks for writing ^^ up will include
it in my next re-spin.



+		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "qcom,protection-domain",
+						    1, &service_path);
+		if (svc_path) {
+			/* skip APR services that are PD independent */
+			if (ret)
+				continue;
+
+			/* skip APR services whose PD paths don't match */
+			if (strcmp(service_path, svc_path))
+				continue;
+		} else {
+			/* skip APR services whose PD lookups are registered */
+			if (ret == 0)
+				continue;
+		}
+

Regards,
Bjorn

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux