Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-12-26 14:23:15)
> On Mon 23 Dec 18:48 PST 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-12-07 12:36:02)
> > > The CLKREF clocks are all fed by the clock signal on the CXO2 pad on the
> > > SoC. Update the definition of these clocks to allow this to be wired up
> > > to the appropriate clock source.
> > >
> > > Retain "xo" as the global named parent to make the change a nop in the
> > > event that DT doesn't carry the necessary clocks definition.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml | 6 ++--
> > > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c | 35 +++++++++++++++----
> > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > What is this patch based on? I think I'm missing some sort of 8996 yaml
> > gcc binding patch.
> >
>
> The patch applies cleanly on linux-next and afaict it depends on the
> yamlification done in 9de7269e9703 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML
> schemas for the QCOM GCC clock bindings"), which git tells me is
> included in v5.5-rc1 as well.
>
> Am I misunderstanding your question?
>
There doesn't seem to be any sort of minitems or maxitems in my yaml
binding file for the clocks or clock-names properties.
