Quoting Niklas Cassel (2019-12-20 09:56:16) > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:23:39PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > This is odd. The clks could be registered with of_clk_hw_register() but > > then we lose the device provider information. Maybe we should search up > > one level to the parent node and if that has a DT node but the > > clk controller device doesn't we should use that instead? > > Hello Stephen, > > Having this in the clk core is totally fine with me, > since it solves my problem. > > Will you cook up a patch, or do you want me to do it? > Can you try the patch I appended to my previous mail? I can write something up more proper later this week.
