Hi Amit,
Thanks for the patch!
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:28:33PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> In order for the old DTBs to continue working, the new interrupt code
> must not return an error if interrupts are not defined.
>
> Fixes: 634e11d5b450a ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support")
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> index 015e7d2015985..d8f51067ed411 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_priv *priv)
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "uplow");
> if (irq < 0) {
> - ret = irq;
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Missing uplow irq in DT\n");
> goto err_put_device;
> }
platform_get_irq_byname() already logs an error if the IRQ cannot be
found: qcom-tsens 4a9000.thermal-sensor: IRQ uplow not found
To replace that error with a warning (not sure if that is worth it),
we would need to replace the call with platform_get_irq_byname_optional().
>
> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get irq\n", __func__);
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get uplow irq\n", __func__);
> + ret = 0;
> goto err_put_device;
In case of the old DT, platform_get_irq_byname() will return -ENXIO,
because no interrupt is specified in the device tree.
So we should have already run into the error earlier,
and jumped to "err_put_device".
Is this hunk really necessary?
In other words, wouldn't it be enough to do something like
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_priv *priv)
irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "uplow");
if (irq < 0) {
ret = irq;
+ if (ret == -ENXIO)
+ ret = 0;
goto err_put_device;
}
... to essentially ignore only the "IRQ does not exist" condition
for old device trees?
Thanks,
Stephan
