On Tue 10 Dec 13:00 PST 2019, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:17 AM Bjorn Andersson > <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue 10 Dec 09:36 PST 2019, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:27 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:18:54PM -0600, Andy Gross wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 07:36:03PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > > > > (Removing arm-soc) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:04 AM Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arnd, Olof, and Kevin, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have one slight faux paux in this pull request. A drivers: soc change got > > > > > > > into my arm64 DTS branch and while it is innocuous, it wasn't easy to fix > > > > > > > without messing up a lot of people who depend on the SHAs not changing. So I'm > > > > > > > sorry for this inclusion. I'll scrub this better next time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > Amit Kucheria (5): > > > > > > > arm64: dts: qcs404: thermal: Add interrupt support > > > > > > > arm64: dts: msm8998: thermal: Add interrupt support > > > > > > > arm64: dts: msm8996: thermal: Add interrupt support > > > > > > > arm64: dts: sdm845: thermal: Add interrupt support > > > > > > > arm64: dts: msm8916: thermal: Fixup HW ids for cpu sensors > > > > > > > > > > > > One of my patches to add interrupt support to msm8916 tsens is missing > > > > > > here. Specifically this one: > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11201853/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Will there be a second PR this cycle? > > > > > > > > > > I can work up another and throw it on top. > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI, the patch seems to be still missing in 5.5-rc1. > > > > tsens now fails to probe on MSM8916 with: > > > > > > > > qcom-tsens 4a9000.thermal-sensor: IRQ uplow not found > > > > > > > > Can you queue up the patch as fix for 5.5? > > > > > > Indeed. Andy/Bjorn, let me know if you need anything from me to get > > > this into -rc2. > > > > > > > I'm pulling in some fixes for a rc-pull, so I could add it there. > > > > But why are we breaking backwards compatibility with existing dtbs to > > add a new (optional) feature? Shouldn't there be a rc-fix in the driver > > for this regression? > > 100% agreed. > > Driver shouldn't require the DT update to continue to function. It > needs to fill in the previous behavior as default. > > As a matter of fact, based on that I don't want to see that DT patch > as a fix, please queue it up for 5.6 instead. > I've picked the patch for 5.6 Thanks, Bjorn
