Quoting Elliot Berman (2019-11-12 13:22:49)
> - Move SMCCC register filling to qcom_scm_call so that qcom_scm_call_do
> only needs to concern itself with retry mechanism.
> - Use arm_smccc_args struct in atomic variants as well.
This is two things. Please split the patch.
> @@ -266,10 +272,14 @@ static int qcom_scm_call(struct device *dev, struct qcom_scm_desc *desc)
> static s32 qcom_scm_call_atomic1(u32 svc, u32 cmd, u32 arg1)
> {
> int context_id;
> + struct arm_smccc_args smc = {0};
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
>
> - arm_smccc_smc(LEGACY_ATOMIC_ID(svc, cmd, 1), (unsigned long)&context_id,
> - arg1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + smc.a[0] = LEGACY_ATOMIC_ID(svc, cmd, 1);
> + smc.a[1] = (unsigned long)&context_id;
> + smc.a[2] = arg1;
> + arm_smccc_smc(smc.a[0], smc.a[1], smc.a[2], smc.a[3],
> + smc.a[4], smc.a[5], smc.a[6], smc.a[7], &res);
>
> return res.a0;
> }
> @@ -287,10 +297,15 @@ static s32 qcom_scm_call_atomic1(u32 svc, u32 cmd, u32 arg1)
> static s32 qcom_scm_call_atomic2(u32 svc, u32 cmd, u32 arg1, u32 arg2)
> {
> int context_id;
> + struct arm_smccc_args smc = {0};
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
>
> - arm_smccc_smc(LEGACY_ATOMIC_ID(svc, cmd, 2), (unsigned long)&context_id,
> - arg1, arg2, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + smc.a[0] = LEGACY_ATOMIC_ID(svc, cmd, 2);
> + smc.a[1] = (unsigned long)&context_id;
> + smc.a[2] = arg1;
> + smc.a[3] = arg2;
> + arm_smccc_smc(smc.a[0], smc.a[1], smc.a[2], smc.a[3],
> + smc.a[4], smc.a[5], smc.a[6], smc.a[7], &res);
>
> return res.a0;
> }
Why are we changing the above two hunks? It's the same code with more
lines right?
