On 15-11-19, 08:55, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 11/15/19 4:27 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > The current design of sending codec parameters assumes that decoders > > will have parsers so they can parse the encoded stream for parameters > > and configure the decoder. > > that's not quite correct. It's rather than there was no need so far for > existing implementations to have parameters on decode, this was never a > limitation of the design, see e.g. the comments below: You might be correct here as this is implementation based and in this case looks like decoders also need the additional params -- ~Vinod
