Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] clk: qcom: Add graphics clock controller driver for SC7180

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Taniya Das (2019-11-15 00:11:28)
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On 11/6/2019 6:00 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-31 05:21:10)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7180.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7180.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..0d893e6
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7180.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> >> +#include <linux/err.h>
> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > 
> > Are these of includes used?
> >
> 
> yes, would clean up these headers.
> 

Maybe they're used. I'm not sure.

> >> +       regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &gpu_cc_sc7180_desc);
> >> +       if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> >> +               return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> >> +
> >> +       /* 360MHz Configuration */
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.l = 0x12;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.alpha = 0xC000;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.config_ctl_val = 0x20485699;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.config_ctl_hi_val = 0x00002067;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.user_ctl_val = 0x00000001;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.user_ctl_hi_val = 0x00004805;
> >> +       gpu_cc_pll_config.test_ctl_hi_val = 0x40000000;
> > 
> > Is there a reason this is built on the stack? Save space or something?
> > 
> 
> I have done as we had discussed during the dispcc review for SDM845
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10446073/
>  >>>
>  >> +static const struct alpha_pll_config disp_cc_pll0_config = {
>  >> +       .l = 0x2c,
>  >> +       .alpha = 0xcaaa,
>  >> +};
>  >
>  > Any reason this can't be put on the stack in the probe function?
>  >
> I would move it.
>  >>>
> 
> In case you think I should move it outside I can do that too.

No I was just wondering what prompted it.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux