Quoting Elliot Berman (2019-11-12 13:22:46)
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
> index 977654bb..b82b450 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
> @@ -302,21 +302,20 @@ int __qcom_scm_hdcp_req(struct device *dev, struct qcom_scm_hdcp_req *req,
>
> void __qcom_scm_init(void)
> {
> - u64 cmd;
> - struct arm_smccc_res res;
> - u32 function = SMCCC_FUNCNUM(QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL);
> -
> - /* First try a SMC64 call */
> - cmd = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,
> - ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, function);
> -
> - arm_smccc_smc(cmd, QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1), cmd & (~BIT(ARM_SMCCC_TYPE_SHIFT)),
> - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> -
> - if (!res.a0 && res.a1)
> - qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64;
> - else
> - qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32;
> + qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64;
> + if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
> + QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) == 1)
Is this asking if the "is call available function" is available by using
the is call available function? That is recursive. Isn't that why we
make a manually open coded SMC call to see if it works? If this isn't
going to work we may want to just have a property in DT that tells us
what to do.
> + goto out;
> +
> + qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32;
> + if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
> + QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) == 1)
> + goto out;
> +
> + qcom_smccc_convention = -1;
> + BUG();
This BUG() is new and not mentioned in the commit text. Why can't we
just start failing all scm calls if we can't detect the calling
convention?
> +out:
> + pr_debug("QCOM SCM SMC Convention: %llu\n", qcom_smccc_convention);
Maybe pr_info() is more appropriate. PSCI currently prints out the
version info so maybe printing something like "QCOM SCM SMC_64 calling
convention" will be useful for early debugging.
