Quoting Elliot Berman (2019-11-12 13:22:39) > Improve understandability of SMCCC macros as they are all functions of > how many arguments can be shoved in registers and how many SCM arguments > are supported. By reversing the logic to build up these defines based on the number of register arguments instead of subtract them out of number of total arguments? Might be worth mentioning that. > > Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > index de337b3..badc245 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > @@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock); > #define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_MAX_RETRY 20 > > #define SMCCC_FUNCNUM(s, c) ((((s) & 0xFF) << 8) | ((c) & 0xFF)) > -#define SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS 7 > -#define SMCCC_FIRST_EXT_IDX 3 > -#define SMCCC_N_REG_ARGS (MAX_QCOM_SCM_ARGS - SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS + 1) > +#define SMCCC_N_REG_ARGS 4 > +#define SMCCC_FIRST_EXT_IDX (SMCCC_N_REG_ARGS - 1) > +#define SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS (MAX_QCOM_SCM_ARGS - SMCCC_N_REG_ARGS + 1) > > static void __qcom_scm_call_do_quirk(const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
