On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 15:07:25)
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 14:52:24)
> > > > Register upper-lower interrupts for each of the two tsens controllers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > > index 96c0a481f454..bb763b362c16 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > > > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@
> > > >
> > > > thermal-zones {
> > > > cpu0-thermal {
> > > > - polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> > > > - polling-delay = <1000>;
> > > > + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> > > > + polling-delay = <0>;
> > >
> > > I thought the plan was to make this unnecessary to change?
> >
> > IMO that change should be part of a different series to the thermal
> > core. I've not actually started working on it yet (traveling for the
> > next 10 days or so) but plan to do it.
> >
>
> Ok so the plan is to change DT and then change it back? That sounds
> quite bad so please fix the thermal core to not care about this before
> applying these changes so that we don't churn DT.
Hi Stephen,
Our emails crossed paths. I think we could just make the property
optional so that we can remove the property completely for drivers
that support interrupts. Comments?
That is a bigger change to the bindings and I don't want to hold the
tsens interrupt support hostage to agreement on this.
Regards,
Amit
