Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2019-08-26 09:45:07) > @@ -61,6 +63,16 @@ static int qcom_apcs_msm8916_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!a53cc) > return -ENOMEM; > > + /* legacy bindings only defined the pll parent clock (index = 0) with no Another nitpick: This is wrong multi-line comment style. SHould be a bare /* on this line. > + * name; when both of the parents are specified in the bindings, the > + * pll is the second one (index = 1). > + */
