Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Add RSC power domain support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/14/2019 11:55 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Maulik Shah (2019-08-13 01:24:42)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index e278fc11fe5c..bd8e9f1a43b4 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -498,6 +498,32 @@ static int tcs_ctrl_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
         return ret;
  }
+/**
+ *  rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle: Check if any of the AMCs are busy.
+ *
+ *  @drv: The controller
+ *
+ *  Returns false if the TCSes are engaged in handling requests,
+ *  True if controller is idle.
+ */
+static bool rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle(struct rsc_drv *drv)
+{
+       int m;
+       struct tcs_group *tcs = get_tcs_of_type(drv, ACTIVE_TCS);
+       bool ret = true;
+
+       spin_lock(&drv->lock);
+       for (m = tcs->offset; m < tcs->offset + tcs->num_tcs; m++) {
+               if (!tcs_is_free(drv, m)) {
Isn't this a copy of an existing function in the rpmh driver?
No.  The changes to add this were previously posted but did not went it.
+                       ret = false;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&drv->lock);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
  /**
   * rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data: Write request to the controller
   *
@@ -521,6 +547,65 @@ int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
         return tcs_ctrl_write(drv, msg);
  }
+int rpmh_domain_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *rsc_pd)
+{
+       struct rsc_drv *drv = container_of(rsc_pd, struct rsc_drv, rsc_pd);
+       int ret = 0;
+
+       /*
+        * RPMh domain can not be powered off when there is pending ACK for
+        * ACTIVE_TCS request. Exit when controller is busy.
+        */
+
+       ret = rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle(drv);
+       if (!ret)
+               goto exit;
return 0? Shouldn't it return some negative value?
Done.
+
+       ret = rpmh_flush(&drv->client);
+       if (ret)
+               goto exit;
Why not just return rpmh_flush(...)?

The usage of goto in this function is entirely unnecessary.
Done.
+
+exit:
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_probe_power_domain(struct platform_device *pdev,
+                                  struct rsc_drv *drv)
+{
+       int ret = -ENOMEM;
+       struct generic_pm_domain *rsc_pd = &drv->rsc_pd;
+       struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
+
+       rsc_pd->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s", dn->name);
+       if (!rsc_pd->name)
+               goto exit;
return -ENOMEM;
Done.
+
+       rsc_pd->name = kbasename(rsc_pd->name);
+       rsc_pd->power_off = rpmh_domain_power_off;
+       rsc_pd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE;
+
+       ret = pm_genpd_init(rsc_pd, NULL, false);
+       if (ret)
+               goto free_name;
+
+       ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(dn, rsc_pd);
+       if (ret)
+               goto remove_pd;
+
+       pr_debug("init PM domain %s\n", rsc_pd->name);
+
+       return ret;
	ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(...)
	if (!ret)
		return 0;

Drop the pr_debug(), it's not useful.
Done.
+
+remove_pd:
+       pm_genpd_remove(rsc_pd);
+
+free_name:
+       kfree(rsc_pd->name);
+
+exit:
+       return ret;
Please remove newlines between labels above.
Done.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux