Hi Stephen,
On 2019-08-21 18:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Here's an attempt at the simple approach. There's another problem where
the cached 'hw' member of the parent data is held around when we don't
know when the caller has destroyed it. Not much else we can do for that
though.
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c0990703ce54..f42a803fb11a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -3737,6 +3737,37 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_nodrv_ops = {
.set_parent = clk_nodrv_set_parent,
};
+static void clk_core_evict_parent_cache_subtree(struct clk_core *root,
+ struct clk_core *target)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct clk_core *child;
+
+ if (!root)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < root->num_parents; i++)
+ if (root->parents[i].core == target)
+ root->parents[i].core = NULL;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry(child, &root->children, child_node)
+ clk_core_evict_parent_cache_subtree(child, target);
+}
+
+/* Remove this clk from all parent caches */
+static void clk_core_evict_parent_cache(struct clk_core *core)
+{
+ struct hlist_head **lists;
+ struct clk_core *root;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
+
+ for (lists = all_lists; *lists; lists++)
+ hlist_for_each_entry(root, *lists, child_node)
+ clk_core_evict_parent_cache_subtree(root, core);
+
+}
+
/**
* clk_unregister - unregister a currently registered clock
* @clk: clock to unregister
@@ -3775,6 +3806,8 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
clk_core_set_parent_nolock(child, NULL);
}
+ clk_core_evict_parent_cache(clk->core);
+
hlist_del_init(&clk->core->child_node);
if (clk->core->prepare_count)
Thanks for the patch. This fixes the dispcc issue which I was observing
with latest kernel on cheza.
You can have the tested by when you post the actual patch.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For reference, below is the error log:
[ 3.992243] msm ae00000.mdss: Adding to iommu group 1
[ 3.999877] msm ae00000.mdss: bound ae01000.mdp (ops
0xffffff8010a87b78)
[ 4.023597] msm ae00000.mdss: failed to bind ae94000.dsi (ops
0xffffff8010a8b360): -517
[ 4.031898] msm ae00000.mdss: master bind failed: -517
[ 5.297509] msm ae00000.mdss: bound ae01000.mdp (ops
0xffffff8010a87b78)
[ 5.320906] msm ae00000.mdss: failed to bind ae94000.dsi (ops
0xffffff8010a8b360): -517
[ 5.329261] msm ae00000.mdss: master bind failed: -517
[ 5.648667] msm ae00000.mdss: bound ae01000.mdp (ops
0xffffff8010a87b78)
[ 5.672005] clk_core_set_parent_nolock: clk dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
can not be parent of clk disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src p_index=-22 <---
error
[ 5.699799] msm ae00000.mdss: failed to bind ae94000.dsi (ops
0xffffff8010a8b360): -22
[ 5.708086] msm ae00000.mdss: master bind failed: -22
[ 5.714052] msm: probe of ae00000.mdss failed with error -22
[ 6.033541] clk_core_set_parent_nolock: clk dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
can not be parent of clk disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src p_index=-22 <---
error
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation