Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v3 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Split pagetable support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jordan,

On 15/08/2019 16:33, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 04:21:38PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
(Sigh, resend. I freaked out my SMTP server)

This is part of an ongoing evolution for enabling split pagetable support for
arm-smmu. Previous versions can be found [1].

In the discussion for v2 Robin pointed out that this is a very Adreno specific
use case and that is exactly true. Not only do we want to configure and use a
pagetable in the TTBR1 space, we also want to configure the TTBR0 region but
not allocate a pagetable for it or touch it until the GPU hardware does so. As
much as I want it to be a generic concept it really isn't.

This revision leans into that idea. Most of the same io-pgtable code is there
but now it is wrapped as an Adreno GPU specific format that is selected by the
compatible string in the arm-smmu device.

Additionally, per Robin's suggestion we are skipping creating a TTBR0 pagetable
to save on wasted memory.

This isn't as clean as I would like it to be but I think that this is a better
direction than trying to pretend that the generic format would work.

I'm tempting fate by posting this and then taking some time off, but I wanted
to try to kick off a conversation or at least get some flames so I can try to
refine this again next week. Please take a look and give some advice on the
direction.

Will, Robin -

Modulo the impl changes from Robin, do you think that using a dedicated
pagetable format is the right approach for supporting split pagetables for the
Adreno GPU?

How many different Adreno drivers would benefit from sharing it?

The more I come back to this, the more I'm convinced that io-pgtable should focus on the heavy lifting of pagetable management - the code that nobody wants to have to write at all, let alone more than once - and any subtleties which aren't essential to that should be pushed back into whichever callers actually care. Consider that already, literally no caller actually uses an unmodified stage 1 TCR value as provided in the io_pgtable_cfg.

I feel it would be most productive to elaborate further in the form of patches, so let me get right on that and try to bash something out before I go home tonight...

Robin.

If so, then is adding the changes to io-pgtable-arm.c possible for 5.4 and then
add the implementation specific code on top of Robin's stack later or do you
feel they should come as part of a package deal?

Jordan

Jordan Crouse (2):
   iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add support for ARM_ADRENO_GPU_LPAE io-pgtable
     format
   iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for Adreno GPU pagetable formats

  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c       |   8 +-
  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c     |   1 +
  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     |   2 +
  4 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux