Hi Quentin,
On 8/8/19 6:32 PM, Quentin Perret wrote:
Hi Douglas,
On Thursday 08 Aug 2019 at 14:18:57 (+0100), Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
frequency invariance.
Is there a patch 2/2 ?
That slipped through when format-patch-ing unrelated commits, there is no 2nd patch.
Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+ unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
+ arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
return 0;
}
@@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
int index;
+ unsigned long freq;
index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
if (index < 0)
@@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
- return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+ arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+
+ return freq;
}
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
--
2.22.0
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Quentin
Thanks,
Douglas
