Re: drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu encoder spinlock initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:57:12AM +0530, Shubhashree Dhar wrote:
> dpu encoder spinlock should be initialized during dpu encoder
> init instead of dpu encoder setup which is part of commit.
> There are chances that vblank control uses the uninitialized
> spinlock if not initialized during encoder init.
> 
> Change-Id: I5a18b95fa47397c834a266b22abf33a517b03a4e
> Signed-off-by: Shubhashree Dhar <dhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch.

I've resolved the conflict and tweaked the commit message a bit to reflect
current reality.

Applied to drm-misc-fixes for 5.3

Sean

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 5f085b5..22938c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -2195,8 +2195,6 @@ int dpu_encoder_setup(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_encoder *enc,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> -	spin_lock_init(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock);
> -
>  	atomic_set(&dpu_enc->frame_done_timeout, 0);
>  	timer_setup(&dpu_enc->frame_done_timer,
>  			dpu_encoder_frame_done_timeout, 0);
> @@ -2250,6 +2248,7 @@ struct drm_encoder *dpu_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  	drm_encoder_helper_add(&dpu_enc->base, &dpu_encoder_helper_funcs);
>  
> +	spin_lock_init(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock);
>  	dpu_enc->enabled = false;
>  
>  	return &dpu_enc->base;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux