Quoting Taniya Das (2019-05-12 20:44:46)
> On 5/10/2019 11:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> >>>> index 5562f38..e40e8f8 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg.h
> >>>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ struct clk_rcg_dfs_data {
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> #define DEFINE_RCG_DFS(r) \
> >>>> - { .rcg = &r##_src, .init = &r##_init }
> >>>> + { .rcg = &r, .init = &r##_init }
> >>>
> >>> Why do we need to rename the init data?
> >>>
> >>
> >> We want to manage the init data as the clock source name, so that we
> >> could manage to auto generate our code. So that we do not have to
> >> re-name the clock init data manually if the DFS source names gets
> >> updated at any point of time.
> >>
> >
> > Why is the clk name changing to not have a _src after the "root" of the
> > clk name? As long as I can remember, RCGs have a "_src" postfix.
> >
>
> Yes, the RCGs would have _src, so we do want the init data also to be
> generated with _src postfix. So that we do not have to manually clean up
> the generated code.
>
Please manually cleanup the generated code, or fix the code
generator to do what you want.
