Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/2019 10:54 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

I want to apply your code to my tree but it isn't easy for me to do
so.  Did you notice the checkpatch.pl warning about the DT bindings
being in a separate patch?  In this case it is not a new binding but
following the process gives the DT maintainers the opportunity to at
least look at your patch.  Because the changes are trivial they may
decide to ignore it but that choice it theirs to make.


Hmm, git log on coresight dt-bindings showed some examples like
this where bindings were updated in the same patch.

Anyways, I have separated out the patch now and resent v5.

Thanks,
Sai

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux