On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:29:29AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:53 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2) Do what Linus suggests above. We can use v1 of this series from last > > September (see below for link) that adds this to the pwm subsystem. > > The locking would need to be added so that it won't conflict with the > > clk subsystem. This can be tied into the input subsystem with the > > existing pwm-vibra driver. > > What I imagined was that the clk driver would double as a pwm driver. > Just register both interfaces. > > There are already plenty of combines clk+reset drivers for example. > > Otherwise I'm all for this approach (but that's just me). I agree that this makes sense. I especially like that it'll allow us to use the existing pwm-vibra driver in the input subsystem with this approach. Brian
