Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support to handle Qcom's wait-for-safe logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/06/2019 11:50, Vivek Gautam wrote:

> On 6/14/2019 6:45 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> # dd if=/dev/sde of=/dev/null bs=1M status=progress
>> 3892314112 bytes (3.9 GB, 3.6 GiB) copied, 50.0042 s, 77.8 MB/s
>>
>> 80 MB/s on msm8998 -- vs -- 300 MB/s on sdm845
>>
>> Do you have the interconnect patches on sdm845 that allow boosting
>> the clock/bandwidth for specific HW blocks?
> 
> Umm, No. This is the upstream 5.2-rc4 plus 4-6 patches to enable display 
> and fix splash screen.
> Is this the performance for UFS? The numbers I posted were for UFS.

Correct, the numbers I provided were for msm8998 UFS...

Basically, it looks like sdm845 UFS is 4x faster than msm8998 UFS
using upstream. Which is surprising (may depend on specific Flash
chip in use though).

Would be good if somebody with both boards could post numbers.
I'll try to post "fresh" numbers when I can.

Regards.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux