Quoting Brian Masney (2019-05-22 01:23:48) > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 07:21:49AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > This is inside the multimedia clk controller. The resource reservation > > mechanism should be complaining loudly here. Is the driver writing > > directly into clk controller registers to adjust a duty cycle of the > > camera's general purpose clk? > > > > Can you add support for duty cycle to the qcom clk driver's RCGs and > > then write a generic clk duty cycle vibrator driver that adjusts the > > duty cycle of the clk? That would be better than reaching into the clk > > controller registers to do this. > > I don't see any complaints in dmesg about this, however I'll work on a > new clk duty cycle vibrator driver. > Ok. Probably no warning because the vibrator driver just creates the io mapping without trying to reserve it with the io requesting APIs.
