On 21/05/2019 11:35, Amit Kucheria wrote: > The "enable-method" property for cpu nodes needs to be "psci" for CPU > idle management to be setup correctly. > > Add a note to the binding documentation to this effect to make it > obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 13 ++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > index 45730ba60af5..3bdbe675b9e6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > @@ -241,9 +241,13 @@ processor idle states, defined as device tree nodes, are listed. > - "psci" > # On ARM 32-bit systems this property is optional > > -The nodes describing the idle states (state) can only be defined within the > -idle-states node, any other configuration is considered invalid and therefore > -must be ignored. > +This assumes that the "enable-method" property is set to "psci" in the cpu > +node[6] that is responsible for setting up CPU idle management in the OS > +implementation. > + > +The nodes describing the idle states (state) can only be defined > +within the idle-states node, any other configuration is considered invalid > +and therefore must be ignored. Nit: I suppose your text editor automatically "reflowed" this last paragraph? I would leave it as-is, to minimize the diff, and avoid cosmetic changes. Regards.
