On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:16 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:39:02PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Sun 05 May 06:04 PDT 2019, Brian Masney wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi > > [..] > > > + clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_MDP_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MDSS_BYTE0_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MDSS_PCLK0_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MDSS_ESC0_CLK>, > > > + <&mmcc MMSS_MISC_AHB_CLK>; > > > + clock-names = "mdp_core", > > > + "iface", > > > + "bus", > > > + "byte", > > > + "pixel", > > > + "core", > > > + "core_mmss"; > > > > Unless I enable MMSS_MMSSNOC_AXI_CLK and MMSS_S0_AXI_CLK I get some > > underrun error from DSI. You don't see anything like this? > > > > (These clocks are controlled by msm_bus downstream and should be driven > > by interconnect upstream) > > > > > > Apart from this, I think this looks nice. Happy to see the progress. > > No, I'm not seeing an underrun errors from the DSI. I think the clocks > are fine since I'm able to get this working with 4.17 using these same > clocks. I just sent out v2 and the cover letter has some details, along > with the full dmesg. since we don't have interconnect driver for 8974, I guess there is some chance that things work or not based on how lk leaves things? BR, -R
