Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Don't use WZR in writel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/05/2019 18:33, Robin Murphy wrote:

> Both Angelo's and your reports strongly imply that the previous 
> constant-folding debate was a red herring and the trivial fix[1] should 
> still be sufficient, but nobody's given me actual confirmation of 
> whether it is or isn't :(

Are you saying that when writing to any of

	gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLH
	gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLNSNH
	base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sTLBGSYNC

the actual value written does not matter? Is it ignored by the HW?

We could write 0xdeadbeef?

Regards.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux