From: Sai Prakash Ranjan
> Sent: 05 April 2019 13:23
>
> From: Mulu He <muluhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Bitmap allocation works on array of unsigned longs and
> for stm master allocation when the number of software
> channels is 32, 4 bytes are allocated and there is a out of
> bound access at the first 8 bytes access of bitmap region.
>
> Fixes: 7bd1d4093c2f ("stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices")
> Signed-off-by: Mulu He <muluhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> index 93ce3aa740a9..21a5838f6e67 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int stp_master_alloc(struct stm_device *stm, unsigned int idx)
> struct stp_master *master;
> size_t size;
>
> - size = ALIGN(stm->data->sw_nchannels, 8) / 8;
> + size = ALIGN(stm->data->sw_nchannels, STM_MASTER_SZ) / STM_MASTER_SZ;
I'm not sure that using STP_MASTER_SZ improves readability at all.
Is there something that gives the size of a bitmap for 'n' items?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
