Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: silence an uninitialized variable warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/4/2019 2:12 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Smatch complains that "ret" might be uninitialized.  I can see why it
generates the warning, but I don't know if it's actually possible.
Anyway initializing "ret" here is harmless.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
index 1c488024c698..fc58d660692f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int __qcom_mdt_load(struct device *dev, const struct firmware *fw,
if (reloc_base)
  		*reloc_base = mem_reloc;
-
+	ret = 0;


You are overriding the value here, better keep it at the start.
Thanks,
Mukesh

  out:
  	kfree(fw_name);



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux