On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: [...] > Instead, my suggestion is according to what I propose in patch 4 and > $subject patch, which means minor adjustments to be able to pass the > struct cpuidle_driver * to the init functions. This, I need it for > next steps, but already at this point it improves things as it avoids > some of the OF parsing, and that's good, isn't it? I will take the patches Mark ACKed and send them for v5.2 as early as it gets in v5.1-rc* cycle. For this one maybe you can post the changes on top and see what's the best way forward ? I agree that duplicating idle state parsing code across back-ends is silly - we just want to keep PSCI and kernel data structure decoupled. Post the code on top and we will find a way forward, OK ? Thanks, Lorenzo
