Quoting Vaishali Thakkar (2019-02-24 22:50:44)
> + qcom_socinfo->dbg_root);
> +
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_NAME(name, apps, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_APPS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_VARIANT(variant, apps, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_APPS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_OEM(oem, apps, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_APPS_INDEX);
> +
> + qcom_socinfo->mpss = debugfs_create_dir("mpss",
> + qcom_socinfo->dbg_root);
> +
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_NAME(name, mpss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_MPSS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_VARIANT(variant, mpss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_MPSS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_OEM(oem, mpss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_MPSS_INDEX);
> +
> + qcom_socinfo->adsp = debugfs_create_dir("adsp",
> + qcom_socinfo->dbg_root);
> +
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_NAME(name, adsp, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_ADSP_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_VARIANT(variant, adsp, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_ADSP_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_OEM(oem, adsp, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_ADSP_INDEX);
> +
> + qcom_socinfo->cnss = debugfs_create_dir("cnss",
> + qcom_socinfo->dbg_root);
> +
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_NAME(name, cnss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_CNSS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_VARIANT(variant, cnss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_CNSS_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_OEM(oem, cnss, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_CNSS_INDEX);
> +
> + qcom_socinfo->video = debugfs_create_dir("video",
> + qcom_socinfo->dbg_root);
> +
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_NAME(name, video, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_VIDEO_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_VARIANT(variant, video, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_VIDEO_INDEX);
> + DEBUGFS_IMAGE_OEM(oem, video, SMEM_IMAGE_TABLE_VIDEO_INDEX);
Couldn't these four lines be a function itself that takes the name,
dbg_root, index, etc and create a directory? Looks like a lot of copy
paste right now.
> }
>
> static void socinfo_debugfs_exit(struct qcom_socinfo *qcom_socinfo)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
