On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 03:01, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On the Qualcomm SDM845 platform the apb_pclk is controlled as part of > the QDSS power/clock domain. Handle this by allowing amba to operate > without direct apb_pclk control, when a powerdomain is attached and no > clock is described. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Resending this separate from the series it was originally part of. > > drivers/amba/bus.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c > index 41b706403ef7..3e13050c6d59 100644 > --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c > @@ -219,8 +219,13 @@ static int amba_get_enable_pclk(struct amba_device *pcdev) > int ret; > > pcdev->pclk = clk_get(&pcdev->dev, "apb_pclk"); > - if (IS_ERR(pcdev->pclk)) > - return PTR_ERR(pcdev->pclk); > + if (IS_ERR(pcdev->pclk)) { > + /* Continue with no clock specified, but pm_domain attached */ > + if (PTR_ERR(pcdev->pclk) == -ENOENT && pcdev->dev.pm_domain) > + pcdev->pclk = NULL; This looks fragile to me. I would prefer to make a do match with DT, to check whether the clock is needed or not. Moreover, there should be no reason to check for the ->dev.pm_domain, because, if there was an error while doing the attach, that should already have been reported/propagated. > + else > + return PTR_ERR(pcdev->pclk); > + } > > ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcdev->pclk); > if (ret) > -- > 2.18.0 > Kind regards Uffe