On 22/01/2019 18:39, Joao Pinto wrote: > On 1/22/2019 5:15 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >> Looking through git log and the linux-scsi archives, it seems that >> Vinayak vanished after 2013. Removing him as a maintainer will make >> get_maintainer.pl generate the list of relevant contributors. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> Martin, sorry for v1, it was a mistake. >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 32d444476a90..76104c9c4824 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -15666,9 +15666,8 @@ F: drivers/visorbus/ >> F: drivers/staging/unisys/ >> >> UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER >> -M: Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@xxxxxxxxx> >> L: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> -S: Supported >> +S: Orphan >> F: Documentation/scsi/ufs.txt >> F: drivers/scsi/ufs/ >> > > I started contributing to the UFS, but currently I am managing one of the driver > development teams in Synopsys, so my bandwitdh is now low. > > Currently I have a person in my team that is very involved in SW development for > UFS Host and we have plans to improve Synopsys driver and submit the improvements. > > I was planning to send this week a patch to add my team member as Maintainer of > the Synopsys UFS driver and if you agree I could suggest him to pick the total > UFS maintenance. > > Please let me know your thoughts about this. As far as I'm concerned, "Supported" or "Maintained" is better than "Orphan" ;-) @Vinayak, do you want to remain as maintainer? Should your email address be updated? @Joao, is your team member still interested? I can send a patch adding him as maintainer, what's his name and address? Is anyone else interested in being maintainer for drivers/scsi/ufs/ ? Regards.
