On 28/01/2019 07:41, Amit Kucheria wrote: > All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device. > Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core > to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get > rid of duplicated code in the drivers. > > In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer > to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a > private data structure. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- [ ... ] > +/* > + * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq > + * driver as a thermal cooling device. > + */ > +#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7) > + Isn't the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV more appropriate? We define a property of the cpufreq driver and the resulting action is to auto-register, no? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
