On 25-01-19, 12:32, Amit Kucheria wrote: > All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device. > Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core > to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get > rid of duplicated code in the drivers. > > In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer > to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a > private data structure. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index e35a886e00bc..cf1be057caf4 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -1318,6 +1318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) > if (cpufreq_driver->ready) > cpufreq_driver->ready(policy); > > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV) > + register_cooling_device(policy); > + > pr_debug("initialization complete\n"); > > return 0; > @@ -1405,6 +1408,9 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu) > goto unlock; > } > > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV) > + unregister_cooling_device(policy); > + > if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu) > cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy); > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index bd7fbd6a4478..c7eb59b8ce94 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/cpumask.h> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h> > #include <linux/completion.h> > #include <linux/kobject.h> > #include <linux/notifier.h> > @@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { > > /* For cpufreq driver's internal use */ > void *driver_data; > + > + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */ > + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev; > }; > > /* Only for ACPI */ > @@ -386,6 +390,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver { > */ > #define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING BIT(6) > > +/* > + * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the cpufreq > + * driver as a thermal cooling device. > + */ > +#define CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV BIT(7) > + > int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data); > int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data); > > @@ -415,6 +425,17 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); > } > > +static inline void register_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy); > +} > + > +static inline void unregister_cooling_device(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev); > + policy->cdev = NULL; > +} I thought that we discussed over chat that you wouldn't add any wrapper routines. How do you see these getting used ? I will suggest that this should be open coded in the core itself. -- viresh