On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:51 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 21. 12. 18 3:37, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 03:12:44PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > >> For all 96Boards, the following standard is used for onboard LEDs. > >> > >> green:user1 default-trigger: heartbeat > >> green:user2 default-trigger: mmc0/disk-activity(onboard-storage) > >> green:user3 default-trigger: mmc1 (SD-card) > >> green:user4 default-trigger: none, panic-indicator > >> yellow:wlan default-trigger: phy0tx > >> blue:bt default-trigger: hci0-power > >> > >> So lets adopt the same for Ultra96, which is one of the 96Boards > >> CE and AI platform. Since the WLAN and BT LEDs are hardwired onboard, > >> consolidate only User LEDs. > >> > > > > Hello, > > > > Any update on this patch? > > I am still waiting for reaction from Rob. > We are keep trying to keep backward compatibility and this patch is > breaking it that's why I want to know DT guys reaction on this change. dts changes and backwards compatibility are ultimately up to the platform maintainers. Your users can yell at you if they care. I only ask that changes that break compatibility are documented as doing so. Personally, I'm in favor of this change. I'd rather seem uniformity across boards and this is just a dev board and LED functions won't affect booting. Rob
