Hi,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:13 AM Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 1/18/19 21:16, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 1:06 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:30 AM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Try to get the interconnect path for the GPU and vote for the maximum
> >>> bandwidth to support all frequencies. This is needed for performance.
> >>> Later we will want to scale the bandwidth based on the frequency to
> >>> also optimize for power but that will require some device tree
> >>> infrastructure that does not yet exist.
> >>>
> >>> v5: Remove hardcoded interconnect name and just use the default
> >>
> >> nit: ${SUBJECT} says v3, but this is v5.
> >>
> >> I'll put in my usual plug for considering "patman" to help post
> >> patches. Even though it lives in the u-boot git repo it's still a gem
> >> for kernel work.
> >> <http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=tools/patman/README>
> >>
> >>
> >>> @@ -85,6 +89,12 @@ static void __a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int index)
> >>> dev_err(gmu->dev, "GMU set GPU frequency error: %d\n", ret);
> >>>
> >>> gmu->freq = gmu->gpu_freqs[index];
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Eventually we will want to scale the path vote with the frequency but
> >>> + * for now leave it at max so that the performance is nominal.
> >>> + */
> >>> + icc_set(gpu->icc_path, 0, MBps_to_icc(7216));
> >>
> >> You'll need to change icc_set() here to icc_set_bw() to match v13, AKA:
> >>
> >> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10766335/
> >> - https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190116161103.6937-2-georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>> @@ -695,6 +707,9 @@ int a6xx_gmu_resume(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> goto out;
> >>>
> >>> + /* Set the bus quota to a reasonable value for boot */
> >>> + icc_set(gpu->icc_path, 0, MBps_to_icc(3072));
> >>
> >> This will also need to change to icc_set_bw()
> >>
> >>
> >>> @@ -781,6 +798,9 @@ int a6xx_gmu_stop(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> >>> /* Tell RPMh to power off the GPU */
> >>> a6xx_rpmh_stop(gmu);
> >>>
> >>> + /* Remove the bus vote */
> >>> + icc_set(gpu->icc_path, 0, 0);
> >>
> >> This will also need to change to icc_set_bw()
> >>
> >>
> >> I have the same questions for this series that I had in response to
> >> the email ("[v5 2/3] drm/msm/dpu: Integrate interconnect API in MDSS")
> >> <https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=XUeMTGH+CDwGs3PfK4igdQrCbwucw7_2ViBc4i7grvxg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>
> >> Copy / pasting here (with minor name changes) so folks don't have to
> >> follow links / search email.
> >>
> >> ==
> >>
> >> I'm curious what the plan is for landing this series. Rob / Gerogi:
> >> do you have any preference? Options I'd imagine:
> >>
> >> A) Wait until interconnect lands (in 5.1?) and land this through
> >> msm-next in the version after (5.2?)
> >>
> >> B) Georgi provides an immutable branch for interconnect when his lands
> >> (assuming he's landing via pull request) and that gets pulled into the
> >> the relevant drm tree.
> >>
> >> C) Rob Acks this series and indicates that it should go in through
> >> Gerogi's tree (probably only works if Georgi plans to send a pull
> >> request). If we're going this route then (IIUC) we'd want to land
> >> this in Gerogi's tree sooner rather than later so it can get some bake
> >> time? NOTE: as per my prior reply, I believe Rob has already Acked
> >> this patch.
> >>
> >
> > I'm ok to ack and have it land via Georgi's tree, if Georgi wants to
> > do that. Or otherwise, I could maybe coordinate w/ airlied to send a
> > 2nd late msm-next pr including the gpu and display interconnect
> > patches.
>
> I'm fine either way. But it would be nice if both patches (this one and
> the dt-bindings go together. The v6 of this patch applies cleanly to my
> tree, but the next one (2/3) with the dt-bindings doesn't.
Ah, right. You need to be based upon commit 85437cddf4e5
("dt-bindings: drm/msm/a6xx: Document GMU and update GPU bindings")
from Rob Clark's msm-next AKA
<git://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux>
...so I guess the easiest is to have the bindings could go through Rob
Clark's tree and the code through you tree if that's what people want
to do?
-Doug
