On 1/21/19 6:30 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 1/18/2019 11:09 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-01-17 20:48:01)
drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
index a5d5167c3f16..1ee298f6bf17 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ config QCOM_RPMHPD
config QCOM_RPMPD
bool "Qualcomm RPM Power domain driver"
Just curious, does it need to be bool for some reason?
Here's the link to the discussion around it on the v3 patchset of this series
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/111
I think you were missing the implication of "if possible", the implication
being that the driver can now not be used in a multi-platform image, and that
having a bool driver depend on tristate drivers doesn't make much if any sense.
The argument in the exchange is odd - one can not remove any driver as long
there are client drivers / devices attached to it. This is true for all
drivers, not just for this one, and handled quite nicely by the driver core.
Just run "lsmod" and try to remove a driver with any attached users.
Guenter
