On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:27 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 5:34:53 PM CET Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Several cpufreq drivers register themselves as thermal cooling devices.
> > Adding a pointer to struct cpufreq_policy removes the need for them to
> > store this pointer in a private data structure.
> >
> > We can then auto-register the cpufreq driver as a thermal cooling device
> > from cpufreq core code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index c86d6d8bdfed..7d0cf54125fa 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> > enum cpufreq_table_sorting freq_table_sorted;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL
> > + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
> > + struct thermal_cooling_device *cooldev;
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Why here and not at the end of the struct?
Fixed
> > struct list_head policy_list;
> > struct kobject kobj;
> > struct completion kobj_unregister;
> >
>
> Also, I would suggest combining this one with patch [02/10].
Will do.
Thanks for the review.
