On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:27 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-01-14 02:21:06)
> > All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
> > Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
> > to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
> > rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 6f23ebb395f1..7faebfc61e60 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> > #include <linux/tick.h>
> > #include <trace/events/power.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
>
> Maybe this is supposed to be ordered alphabetically? If so, this should
> be much higher.
Fixed
> >
> > static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
> >
> > @@ -1318,6 +1319,12 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
> > cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV) {
> > + struct thermal_cooling_device **cdev = &policy->cooldev;
> > +
> > + *cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> > + }
>
> This seems to be some complicated way of writing:
>
> policy->cooldev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
>
> ?
Indeed. Fixed.
> > +
> > pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1411,6 +1418,12 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > if (has_target())
> > cpufreq_exit_governor(policy);
> >
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_AUTO_REGISTER_COOLING_DEV) {
> > + struct thermal_cooling_device **cdev = &policy->cooldev;
> > +
> > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(*cdev);
>
> Similar? I'm confused!
>
_un_register as opposed to register above. :-)
Thanks for the review.
